• (230) 4278861, 4260399

Custom Recordal of IPRs in Peru

Peru

Custom Recordal of IPRs
Yes
No
Yes
The Decision 486- Common Provisions on Industrial Property* (of September 14, 2000) - forms the legal basis for Custom Recordal of IPRs (Border Control Measures) in Peru.
Custom Recordal of IPRs is effective both on the import and export of goods.
With regard to counterfeit trademarks, the customs responsible for warning and verifying if the exported and imported goods infringe any intellectual property rights. To this end, they request INDECOPI to verify the registration and validity of the marks that are subject to presumed infringement. The Customs authority only owns a list of records to warn the owner of a registered trademark of the entry of goods, including the packaging bearing an identical or confusingly similar sign to the validly registered trademark without authorization, so that such goods would infringe the rights granted to the owner of the trademark by the legislation of the import country.
The holder of an IPR linked to the goods subject to import, export, or transit, may request the Customs Administration the provisional suspension of said operation, while the competent judicial authority resolves the complaint or demand that the holder must present by the alleged pirate or false brand status. If this condition is established, the release, or the authorization of shipment of the merchandise, or the Customs Transit, as the case may be, will not proceed.
The suspension of the customs operation may also be ordered directly by the competent authority, as a precautionary measure and while resolving the merits of the matter.
The suspension request will be known to the Foreign Trade Service Division, or an agency that takes its place, of the Customs Administration where the import, export, or transit is processed.
The request must be presented personally by the holder of the IPR; the Federation or Association empowered to represent it; the legal representative or attorney, duly constituted. The following information will be provided in it:
1. Full name, identification, and residence address of the holder of the IPR.
2. Name or company name and address of who in the country is authorized or licensed to enjoy the IPR.
3. Identification of your IPR and the facts in which the violation of it consists. If possible, the alleged perpetrators will be identified. In the case of a trademark, the registration certificate number will be indicated.
4. Indication of the place where the genuine merchandise is edited, engraved, printed or, in general, produced; the identity of the manufacturer, his address, and other means of communication that he knows.
5. Detailed description of the authentic goods.
6. If possible, the description of the supposedly pirated or false brand merchandise, object of the request, and indication of the place of its location.
7. If the holder of the IPR considers it necessary and have not previously done so, the request for authorization to examine the merchandise.
Annexes . The following documents need to be attached to the request:
1. Copy of the registration, title, or document that accredits you as the owner of the right, in the events where this is legally necessary to establish the right.
2. The power of attorney or document that certifies the quality with which it is acted, if applicable.
3. If the process on violation of IPRs has already been brought before the competent authority, a copy of the corresponding complaint or demand will also be attached.
4. The pieces of evidence that demonstrate the existence of an indication of infringement of the right.
Yes
The Customs Administration will admit or reject the request within three (03) days following its presentation.
Yes, the customs authority has a centralized system.
The customs recordal is applicable for a year’s duration and may be renewed every year, 30 days before the expiry to maintain the continuity.
Yes
If the customs find that the goods might infringe upon the rights of the IP holder, they may suspend the clearance of imported goods.
The petitioner bears the liabilities and expenses related to suspension of the release of infringing goods.
Yes - authorization to the petitioner to examine the merchandise, within the following 05days. This diligence will be carried out in the presence of the customs authority and the costs will be in charge of the petitioner.
Yes
Yes
10 business days
Yes
The same is supposed to be produced within 10 days. It may be extended by initiating a request for additional 10 business days.
Yes
The valuation is calculated as follows:
  • The constitution of a guarantee, bank or insurance company, within 05 days following the execution of the order, equivalent to twenty percent (20%) of the FOB value of the merchandise, to guarantee the damages that are eventually caused to the importer or exporter, without prejudice to the responsibility of another order.
  • In the case of highly perishable goods, and without prejudice to the claim before the competent authority, there will be no suspension of the customs operation if the user so requests and constitutes a bank or insurance company guarantee, equivalent to 100% of the FOB value of the merchandise, to guarantee the damages that may be caused by the alleged violation of intellectual property rights. In this case, a sample of the merchandise may be taken.
Where such goods are found and detained, the customs inform both the parties to allow observance of the merchandise. The observation of the merchandise will be done without prejudice to the protection of confidential information and may be witnessed by the customs user, who may not interfere in the procedure or hinder it.
The rights holder has 10 business days to initiate infringement proceedings through the judicial system, or to have the suspension extended. If the copyright holder fails to act, this temporary suspension shall be lifted and the goods will be released.
No
Yes
The court may require the submission of other documents as well.
The possible remedies awarded by the court include destruction of goods outside the channels of commerce.
No